Three-move interactive proof (commit, challenge, response) proving knowledge of a secret without revealing it. Used in Solana's confidential transfers: the sender proves they have sufficient balance and the transfer is valid without revealing amounts. Can be made non-interactive via Fiat-Shamir heuristic.
Comece pela explicação mais curta e útil antes de aprofundar.
Three-move interactive proof (commit, challenge, response) proving knowledge of a secret without revealing it. Used in Solana's confidential transfers: the sender proves they have sufficient balance and the transfer is valid without revealing amounts. Can be made non-interactive via Fiat-Shamir heuristic.
Use primeiro a analogia curta para raciocinar melhor sobre o termo quando ele aparecer em código, docs ou prompts.
Pense nisso como parte da engrenagem que mantém a ordenação, execução ou consenso da rede funcionando.
Coloque o termo dentro da camada de Solana em que ele vive para raciocinar melhor sobre ele.
Consenso, rotação de líderes, slots, epochs e o runtime.
Transforme o termo de vocabulário em algo operacional para produto e engenharia.
Este termo destrava conceitos adjacentes rapidamente, então funciona melhor quando você o trata como um ponto de conexão, não como definição isolada.
Use este bloco compacto quando quiser dar contexto aterrado para um agente ou assistente sem despejar a página inteira.
Sigma Protocol (sigma-protocol) Categoria: Protocolo Base Definição: Three-move interactive proof (commit, challenge, response) proving knowledge of a secret without revealing it. Used in Solana's confidential transfers: the sender proves they have sufficient balance and the transfer is valid without revealing amounts. Can be made non-interactive via Fiat-Shamir heuristic. Aliases: Zero-Knowledge Proof Protocol Relacionados: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP), ElGamal Encryption, Groth16
Use contexto do glossário, relações entre termos, modelos mentais e builder paths para receber respostas estruturadas em vez de output genérico.
Opcional: cole código Anchor, Solana ou Rust para o Copilot mapear primitivas de volta para termos do glossário.
O Copilot vai responder usando o termo atual, conceitos relacionados, modelos mentais e o grafo ao redor do glossário.
Esses ramos mostram quais conceitos esse termo toca diretamente e o que existe uma camada além deles.
A zero-knowledge proof is a cryptographic protocol by which a prover convinces a verifier that a statement is true — for example, that a state transition is valid — without revealing any information beyond the truth of the statement itself, satisfying the properties of completeness, soundness, and zero-knowledge. In Solana's ecosystem, ZKPs are used by ZK Compression (via Groth16 SNARKs) to prove correct state transitions for compressed accounts without storing full account state on-chain, and by the Token-2022 Confidential Transfers extension (via ElGamal encryption and range proofs) to prove token balances are non-negative without revealing the actual amounts. Solana's BPF VM exposes the alt_bn128 elliptic curve syscall to make on-chain Groth16 proof verification computationally feasible within the 1.4M compute unit budget.
ElGamal encryption is a public-key cryptosystem based on the Diffie-Hellman problem over an elliptic curve group, providing additive homomorphism — meaning the encryption of a sum of values equals the product of their individual ciphertexts — which makes it suitable for confidential token balance accounting where balances can be updated without decrypting them. On Solana, the Token-2022 Confidential Transfers extension uses Twisted ElGamal encryption over the Ristretto255 curve to encrypt token balances in token accounts, so transfers update encrypted balances homomorphically while zero-knowledge range proofs (proving a balance is non-negative and a transfer amount is within bounds) prevent overdrafts without revealing any amounts. Each confidential token account stores a pending encrypted incoming balance and an available encrypted balance, and the account owner uses their ElGamal private key to decrypt and rotate balances via ZK-proof-accompanied instructions.
Groth16 is a highly efficient zk-SNARK proving system introduced by Jens Groth in 2016 that produces constant-size proofs (128 bytes: two G1 points and one G2 point on a pairing-friendly elliptic curve) with constant-time verification regardless of circuit complexity, making it the preferred proof system for on-chain verification where calldata and compute costs are constrained. Light Protocol uses Groth16 proofs over the BN254 curve (known as alt_bn128 in Ethereum tooling) to verify compressed account state transitions on Solana, leveraging the native alt_bn128 pairing and point-addition syscalls added to the SVM to keep verification within the per-transaction compute unit limit. The trade-off is that Groth16 requires a trusted setup ceremony per circuit, producing a structured reference string (SRS) whose security relies on participants honestly discarding their toxic waste.
Estes são os próximos conceitos que valem abrir se você quiser que este termo faça mais sentido dentro de um workflow real de Solana.
Essas entradas são fáceis de misturar quando você lê rápido, faz prompting em um LLM ou está entrando em uma nova camada de Solana.
A native Solana program (address: KeccakSecp256k11111111111111111111111111111) that verifies secp256k1 ECDSA signatures on-chain, enabling Ethereum-compatible signature verification within Solana programs. This precompile allows Solana dApps to verify signatures produced by Ethereum wallets (MetaMask, etc.), facilitating cross-chain identity verification, bridging, and interoperability without requiring users to create Solana-native keypairs.
Entradas de glossário só ficam úteis quando estão conectadas. Esses links são o caminho mais curto para ideias adjacentes.
A zero-knowledge proof is a cryptographic protocol by which a prover convinces a verifier that a statement is true — for example, that a state transition is valid — without revealing any information beyond the truth of the statement itself, satisfying the properties of completeness, soundness, and zero-knowledge. In Solana's ecosystem, ZKPs are used by ZK Compression (via Groth16 SNARKs) to prove correct state transitions for compressed accounts without storing full account state on-chain, and by the Token-2022 Confidential Transfers extension (via ElGamal encryption and range proofs) to prove token balances are non-negative without revealing the actual amounts. Solana's BPF VM exposes the alt_bn128 elliptic curve syscall to make on-chain Groth16 proof verification computationally feasible within the 1.4M compute unit budget.
ElGamal encryption is a public-key cryptosystem based on the Diffie-Hellman problem over an elliptic curve group, providing additive homomorphism — meaning the encryption of a sum of values equals the product of their individual ciphertexts — which makes it suitable for confidential token balance accounting where balances can be updated without decrypting them. On Solana, the Token-2022 Confidential Transfers extension uses Twisted ElGamal encryption over the Ristretto255 curve to encrypt token balances in token accounts, so transfers update encrypted balances homomorphically while zero-knowledge range proofs (proving a balance is non-negative and a transfer amount is within bounds) prevent overdrafts without revealing any amounts. Each confidential token account stores a pending encrypted incoming balance and an available encrypted balance, and the account owner uses their ElGamal private key to decrypt and rotate balances via ZK-proof-accompanied instructions.
Groth16 is a highly efficient zk-SNARK proving system introduced by Jens Groth in 2016 that produces constant-size proofs (128 bytes: two G1 points and one G2 point on a pairing-friendly elliptic curve) with constant-time verification regardless of circuit complexity, making it the preferred proof system for on-chain verification where calldata and compute costs are constrained. Light Protocol uses Groth16 proofs over the BN254 curve (known as alt_bn128 in Ethereum tooling) to verify compressed account state transitions on Solana, leveraging the native alt_bn128 pairing and point-addition syscalls added to the SVM to keep verification within the per-transaction compute unit limit. The trade-off is that Groth16 requires a trusted setup ceremony per circuit, producing a structured reference string (SRS) whose security relies on participants honestly discarding their toxic waste.
Essas entradas vivem ao lado do termo atual e ajudam a página a parecer parte de um grafo maior, não um beco sem saída.
A clock mechanism that cryptographically proves the passage of time between events. PoH uses a sequential SHA-256 hash chain where each output becomes the next input, creating a verifiable ordering of events without requiring consensus. The leader produces ~400,000 hashes per slot (~400ms), and any validator can verify the sequence in parallel, enabling Solana's high throughput by removing the need for validators to agree on time.
Solana's custom BFT consensus algorithm built on top of Proof of History. Tower BFT uses PoH as a clock to reduce communication overhead in traditional PBFT from O(n²) to O(n). Validators vote on forks with exponentially increasing lockout periods—each consecutive vote doubles the lockout, making rollbacks progressively more expensive. A fork is finalized when it reaches supermajority (66.7%+ of stake).
A time window during which a designated leader validator can produce a block. Each slot lasts approximately 400 milliseconds. Slots are numbered sequentially from genesis and grouped into epochs of 432,000 slots (~2-3 days). Not every slot produces a block—a skipped slot means the leader was offline or too slow.
A set of entries produced by a leader during a single slot. A block contains transactions bundled into entries, each with a PoH hash proving ordering. Blocks are broken into shreds for network propagation via Turbine. Maximum block size is limited by compute units (48M CU cap per block) rather than byte size.