A development organization that spun out of Solana Labs in early 2024 to independently maintain and develop the Agave validator client and core Solana toolchain. Anza also maintains the @solana/kit SDK (formerly web3.js v2), the Anchor framework, and the SVM API. The spin-off was intended to decentralize Solana's core development and improve client diversity.
Start with the shortest useful explanation before going deeper.
A development organization that spun out of Solana Labs in early 2024 to independently maintain and develop the Agave validator client and core Solana toolchain. Anza also maintains the @solana/kit SDK (formerly web3.js v2), the Anchor framework, and the SVM API. The spin-off was intended to decentralize Solana's core development and improve client diversity.
Use the quick analogy first so the term is easier to reason about when you meet it in code, docs, or prompts.
Think of it as part of the chain machinery that keeps ordering, execution, or consensus moving.
Place the term inside its Solana layer so the definition is easier to reason about.
Consensus, leader rotation, slots, epochs, and the runtime.
Turn the term from vocabulary into something operational for product and engineering work.
This term unlocks adjacent concepts quickly, so it works best when you treat it as a junction instead of an isolated definition.
Use this compact block when you want to give an agent or assistant grounded context without dumping the entire page.
Anza (anza) Category: Core Protocol Definition: A development organization that spun out of Solana Labs in early 2024 to independently maintain and develop the Agave validator client and core Solana toolchain. Anza also maintains the @solana/kit SDK (formerly web3.js v2), the Anchor framework, and the SVM API. The spin-off was intended to decentralize Solana's core development and improve client diversity. Aliases: Anza Technology Related: Agave, Firedancer, Web3.js v2 (@solana/kit)
Use glossary context, relationships, mental models, and builder paths to get structured answers instead of generic chat output.
Optional: paste Anchor, Solana, or Rust code so the Copilot can map primitives back to glossary terms.
The Copilot will answer using the current term, related concepts, mental models, and the surrounding glossary graph.
These branches show which concepts this term touches directly and what sits one layer beyond them.
The Rust-based Solana validator client maintained by Anza (formerly Solana Labs). Agave is the original and most widely deployed validator implementation. It handles all aspects of validation: TPU, TVU, gossip, AccountsDB, and RPC. The name 'Agave' was adopted to distinguish it from the Firedancer client.
A from-scratch Solana validator client written in C by Jump Crypto. Firedancer aims for significant performance improvements through a tiled, zero-copy architecture and hardware-optimized networking. It provides client diversity—critical for network resilience—and targets 1M+ TPS. Frankendancer is the intermediate version running Firedancer's networking stack with the Agave execution engine.
The next-generation Solana TypeScript SDK (@solana/kit, formerly @solana/web3.js v2) featuring a modular, functional API. Unlike v1's monolithic classes, v2 uses composable functions and tree-shaking for smaller bundles. Key changes: pipe-based transaction building, codec-based serialization, and native support for versioned transactions. Significantly smaller bundle size than v1.
These are the next concepts worth opening if you want this term to make more sense inside a real Solana workflow.
These entries are easy to mix up when you are reading quickly, prompting an LLM, or onboarding into a new layer of Solana.
The Rust-based Solana validator client maintained by Anza (formerly Solana Labs). Agave is the original and most widely deployed validator implementation. It handles all aspects of validation: TPU, TVU, gossip, AccountsDB, and RPC. The name 'Agave' was adopted to distinguish it from the Firedancer client.
The persistent storage layer for all Solana accounts. AccountsDB stores account data in memory-mapped AppendVec files, indexed by pubkey and slot. It supports fast lookups, handles account deduplication across slots, and periodically cleans up dead accounts. AccountsDB is the largest consumer of validator disk space.
A next-generation consensus protocol proposed in SIMD-0326 that aims to collapse Solana's legacy systems (Proof of History, Tower BFT, gossip-based vote propagation) into two streamlined mechanisms: Rotor for data propagation and Votor for off-chain voting. Alpenglow targets reducing transaction finality from ~12.8 seconds to under 150 milliseconds, representing the most significant consensus overhaul in Solana's history.
Glossary entries become useful when they are connected. These links are the shortest path to adjacent ideas.
The Rust-based Solana validator client maintained by Anza (formerly Solana Labs). Agave is the original and most widely deployed validator implementation. It handles all aspects of validation: TPU, TVU, gossip, AccountsDB, and RPC. The name 'Agave' was adopted to distinguish it from the Firedancer client.
A from-scratch Solana validator client written in C by Jump Crypto. Firedancer aims for significant performance improvements through a tiled, zero-copy architecture and hardware-optimized networking. It provides client diversity—critical for network resilience—and targets 1M+ TPS. Frankendancer is the intermediate version running Firedancer's networking stack with the Agave execution engine.
The next-generation Solana TypeScript SDK (@solana/kit, formerly @solana/web3.js v2) featuring a modular, functional API. Unlike v1's monolithic classes, v2 uses composable functions and tree-shaking for smaller bundles. Key changes: pipe-based transaction building, codec-based serialization, and native support for versioned transactions. Significantly smaller bundle size than v1.
These entries live beside the current term and help the page feel like part of a larger knowledge graph instead of a dead end.
A clock mechanism that cryptographically proves the passage of time between events. PoH uses a sequential SHA-256 hash chain where each output becomes the next input, creating a verifiable ordering of events without requiring consensus. The leader produces ~400,000 hashes per slot (~400ms), and any validator can verify the sequence in parallel, enabling Solana's high throughput by removing the need for validators to agree on time.
Solana's custom BFT consensus algorithm built on top of Proof of History. Tower BFT uses PoH as a clock to reduce communication overhead in traditional PBFT from O(n²) to O(n). Validators vote on forks with exponentially increasing lockout periods—each consecutive vote doubles the lockout, making rollbacks progressively more expensive. A fork is finalized when it reaches supermajority (66.7%+ of stake).
A time window during which a designated leader validator can produce a block. Each slot lasts approximately 400 milliseconds. Slots are numbered sequentially from genesis and grouped into epochs of 432,000 slots (~2-3 days). Not every slot produces a block—a skipped slot means the leader was offline or too slow.
A set of entries produced by a leader during a single slot. A block contains transactions bundled into entries, each with a PoH hash proving ordering. Blocks are broken into shreds for network propagation via Turbine. Maximum block size is limited by compute units (48M CU cap per block) rather than byte size.